On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/28/11 11:23, Eliad Peller wrote: >> hi Igor, >> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 11/22/11 16:02, Eliad Peller wrote: >>>> Add pm_caps field to omap2_hsmmc_info and omap_mmc_slot_data >>>> structs, so we will be able to indicate mmc pm capabilities >>>> in the board file. >>> >>> Shouldn't this be user space runtime controllable? >>> Instead of being a static per board decision? >>> >> we only declare here support for the pm capabilities. >> the actual configuration of these capabilities is done at a later >> stage, and can be controlled (implicitly) by userspace (e.g. by >> enabling Wakeup-On-Wireless for the wl12xx chip). > > This is good to hear, because patch 1/3 makes it look like > the bus power does get immediately affected depending > on that capability, isn't it? > no. it checks pm_flags (configured pm features) rather than pm_caps (supported pm features). Eliad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
