On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Grant Likely wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: >> > > > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each >> > > > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > > --- >> > > > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch, >> > > > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch? >> > > > >> > > >> > > Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should >> > > go into the same one. >> > > >> > > If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch. >> > >> > Already upstream >> >> Ok, I see. I've applied both patches to the fixes branch and will send >> it out with the next pull request for 3.1 to Linus then. > > Sorry, I just noticed that the second patch is not a bug fix, so I took it out > again and kept only patch 1/2 in the fixes branch for 3.1. > > Should I take the other one as well? It's probably better to let that > go the proper way through the tegra tree for 3.2, right? Given that you have a public tree right now, and I don't (since kernel.org is down), please feel free to start a tegra/for-3.2 branch for me and apply it there. I'll base further work on top of that if needed. (There also aren't a whole lot of other patches queued for 3.2 right now). -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html