On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each > > > > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch, > > > > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch? > > > > > > > > > > Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should > > > go into the same one. > > > > > > If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch. > > > > Already upstream > > Ok, I see. I've applied both patches to the fixes branch and will send > it out with the next pull request for 3.1 to Linus then. Sorry, I just noticed that the second patch is not a bug fix, so I took it out again and kept only patch 1/2 in the fixes branch for 3.1. Should I take the other one as well? It's probably better to let that go the proper way through the tegra tree for 3.2, right? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
