On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC > > controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It merges > > sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so that the same pair of > > .probe/.remove hook works with eSDHC for two platforms. > > > > As the results, sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc.h are removed, and > > header esdhc.h containing the definition of esdhc_platform_data is > > put into the public folder. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I agree with Anton about not merging the two... > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX > > +#define cpu_is_mx25() (0) > > +#define cpu_is_mx35() (0) > > +#define cpu_is_mx51() (0) > > +#define cpu_is_imx() (0) > > +#else > > +#define cpu_is_imx() (1) > > +#endif > > ... e.g. that looks a bit frightening. > Agree. The use of cpu_is_mx..() in the driver itself seems a churn to me even without this consolidation patch. Is it possible for us to eliminate them by using pdata, and eventually device tree? When we are there, I might want to revisit the consolidation again. -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
