Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: add support for pre_req and post_req

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:26:01AM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Shawn
> 
> I tested using ADMA with your patch...(benchmark : IOzone)
> But I didn't get improvement of performance with ADMA..
> (i can see improvement of performance with SDMA)
> 
> I want to know how you think about this..
> 
It's still an open question if pre_req and post_req were correctly
added, even you have seen improvement of SDMA case with IOzone.  I
would leave the question to Per Forlin.

With your result, I'm interested in trying IOzone test with esdhc
to see any difference with SDMA.

BTW, what is the number of performance improvement you are seeing?
And do you have mmc_test result to share?

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux