On 17 April 2011 17:46, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:07:04PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
> [...]
>> +static int mmc_test_rw_multiple(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>> + struct mmc_test_multiple_rw *tdata,
>> + unsigned int reqsize, unsigned int size)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int dev_addr;
>> + struct mmc_test_area *t = &test->area;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + int max_reqsize = max(t->mem->size_min_cmn *
>> + min(t->max_segs, t->mem->cnt), t->max_tfr);
>> +
> The 'max(..., t->max_tfr)' probably should be 'min(..., t->max_tfr)'.
> Otherwise, I see mmc_test failure on my mxs-mmc setup.
>
> mmc0: Test case 37. Write performance with blocking req 4k to 4MB...
> mmc0: Transfer of 64 x 2048 sectors (64 x 1024 KiB) took 5.412563314 seconds (12
> 398 kB/s, 12108 KiB/s, 11.82 IOPS)
> mmc0: Failed to map sg list
> [mmc_test_rw_multiple] error
> mmc0: Result: ERROR (-22)
Thanks for letting me know. I think I should simplify it and use
t->max_tfr only.
I tried to optimize for one of my case when max_tfr is only 1MiB but
mmc request size is 32MiB.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shawn
Regards,
Per
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
