On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The patch turns the common stuff in sdhci-pltfm.c into functions, and > add device drivers their own .probe and .remove which in turn call > into the common functions, so that those sdhci-pltfm device drivers > register itself and keep all device specific things away from common > sdhci-pltfm file. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- I'll second the comments from Grant (with one slight exception which is noted below) > +static int __devexit sdhci_dove_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + int dead = 0; > + u32 scratch; > + > + scratch = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS); > + if (scratch == (u32)-1) > + dead = 1; I'd prefer dead = (readl() == 0xffffffff); (or (u32)-1 if you prefer). But keeping a variable 'dead' is more descriptive than keeping 'scratch'. > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); Just to be sure: Did you double-check if the original licenses were v2 or v2+? > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c [...] > -err_add_host: > - if (pdata && pdata->exit) > - pdata->exit(host); > -err_plat_init: > - iounmap(host->ioaddr); > err_remap: > release_mem_region(iomem->start, resource_size(iomem)); > err_request: > sdhci_free_host(host); > err: > - printk(KERN_ERR"Probing of sdhci-pltfm failed: %d\n", ret); > - return ret; > + pr_err("%s failed %d\n", __func__, ret); dev_err? > + return NULL; > } > I didn't pay much attention to the OF version of the tegra driver, since it still is not upstream yet, right? Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature