On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This resolves the deadlock issue with suspend. There is no >>> need to claim host before the remove op. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > ... >> I think this means we can take >> 1c8cf9c997a4a6b36e907c7ede5f048aeaab1644 out (mmc: sdio: fix SDIO >> suspend/resume regression). > > I don't see how is this related ? > > 1c8cf9c997a4a6b36e907c7ede5f048aeaab1644 makes sure the -ENOSYS > semantics of mmc_sdio_suspend() are followed. > I thought that code was added as a fix for problems in the pm_notifier, but I misread the code and I was wrong. Thanks, A -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
