RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during uhs initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nath, Arindam
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:12 PM
> To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during
> uhs initialization
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:04 PM
> > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during
> > uhs initialization
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc-
> > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nath, Arindam
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:53 AM
> > > To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning
> during
> > > uhs initialization
> > >
> > > Hi Subhash,
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:50 AM
> > > > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning
> > during
> > > > uhs initialization
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Nath, Arindam [mailto:Arindam.Nath@xxxxxxx]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:45 AM
> > > > > To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning
> > > during
> > > > > uhs initialization
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Subhash,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:38 AM
> > > > > > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron;
> anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning
> > > > during
> > > > > > uhs initialization
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc-
> > > > > > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nath, Arindam
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:37 PM
> > > > > > > To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron;
> > anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for
> tuning
> > > > > during
> > > > > > > uhs initialization
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Subhash,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:29 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron;
> > > anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for
> > tuning
> > > > > > during
> > > > > > > > uhs initialization
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Arindam Nath [mailto:anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > > > > Arindam
> > > > > > > > > Nath
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 5:03 PM
> > > > > > > > > To: cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > > > > > subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > > > henry.su@xxxxxxx;
> > > > > > > > > aaron.lu@xxxxxxx; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx; Arindam Nath
> > > > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for
> tuning
> > > > > during
> > > > > > > uhs
> > > > > > > > > initialization
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Host Controller needs tuning during initialization to
> > > operate
> > > > > > SDR50
> > > > > > > > > and SDR104 UHS-I cards. Whether SDR50 mode actually
> needs
> > > > > tuning
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > indicated by bit 45 of the Host Controller Capabilities
> > > > > register.
> > > > > > > > > A new command CMD19 has been defined in the Physical
> > Layer
> > > > spec
> > > > > > > > > v3.01 to request the card to send tuning pattern.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We enable Buffer Read Ready interrupt at the very
> > begining
> > > of
> > > > > > > tuning
> > > > > > > > > procedure, because that is the only interrupt generated
> > by
> > > > the
> > > > > > Host
> > > > > > > > > Controller during tuning. The tuning block is sent by
> the
> > > > card
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Host Controller using DAT lines, so we set Data Present
> > > > Select
> > > > > > (bit
> > > > > > > > 5)
> > > > > > > > > in the Command register. The Host Controller is
> > responsible
> > > > for
> > > > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > the verfication of tuning block sent by the card at the
> > > > > hardware
> > > > > > > > level.
> > > > > > > > > After sending CMD19, we wait for Buffer Read Ready
> > > interrupt.
> > > > > In
> > > > > > > case
> > > > > > > > > we don't receive an interrupt after the specified
> timeout
> > > > > value,
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > fall back on fixed sampling clock by setting Execute
> > Tuning
> > > > > (bit
> > > > > > 6)
> > > > > > > > > and Sampling Clock Seletc (bit 7) of Host Control2
> > register
> > > > to
> > > > > 0.
> > > > > > > > > Before exiting the tuning procedure, we disable Buffer
> > Read
> > > > > Ready
> > > > > > > > > interrupt.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/mmc/core/sd.c     |    4 +
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c  |  137
> > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h  |    3 +
> > > > > > > > >  include/linux/mmc/host.h  |    1 +
> > > > > > > > >  include/linux/mmc/mmc.h   |    1 +
> > > > > > > > >  include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h |    4 +
> > > > > > > > >  6 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > > > > > > > index be01397..1e2d157 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static int
> > mmc_sd_init_uhs_card(struct
> > > > > > > mmc_card
> > > > > > > > > *card)
> > > > > > > > >         /* Set current limit for the card */
> > > > > > > > >         err = sd_set_current_limit(card, status);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +       /* SPI mode doesn't define CMD19 */
> > > > > > > > > +       if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && card->host-
> > > >ops-
> > > > > > > > > >execute_tuning)
> > > > > > > > > +               card->host->ops->execute_tuning(card-
> > > >host);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >  out:
> > > > > > > > >         kfree(status);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > > > > > > > index 245cc39..8f4f102 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
> > > > > > > > >  #define SDHCI_USE_LEDS_CLASS
> > > > > > > > >  #endif
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +#define MAX_TUNING_LOOP 40
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >  static unsigned int debug_quirks = 0;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *,
> > struct
> > > > > > > mmc_data
> > > > > > > > > *);
> > > > > > > > > @@ -985,7 +987,9 @@ static void
> sdhci_send_command(struct
> > > > > > > sdhci_host
> > > > > > > > > *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> > > > > > > > >                 flags |= SDHCI_CMD_CRC;
> > > > > > > > >         if (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_OPCODE)
> > > > > > > > >                 flags |= SDHCI_CMD_INDEX;
> > > > > > > > > -       if (cmd->data)
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       /* CMD19 is special in that the Data Present
> > Select
> > > > > should
> > > > > > be set
> > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > +       if (cmd->data || (cmd->opcode ==
> > > > > MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK))
> > > > > > > > >                 flags |= SDHCI_CMD_DATA;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_CMD(cmd->opcode,
> > > > flags),
> > > > > > > > > SDHCI_COMMAND);
> > > > > > > > > @@ -1485,6 +1489,119 @@ static int
> > > > > > sdhci_get_max_current_180(struct
> > > > > > > > > mmc_host *mmc)
> > > > > > > > >         return max_current_180;
> > > > > > > > >  }
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +static void sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > > +       struct sdhci_host *host;
> > > > > > > > > +       u16 ctrl;
> > > > > > > > > +       int tuning_loop_counter = MAX_TUNING_LOOP;
> > > > > > > > > +       unsigned long flags;
> > > > > > > > > +       unsigned long timeout;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       /*
> > > > > > > > > +        * Host Controller needs tuning only in case of
> > > > SDR104
> > > > > mode
> > > > > > > > > +        * and for SDR50 mode when Use Tuning for SDR50
> > is
> > > > set
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > +        * Capabilities register.
> > > > > > > > > +        */
> > > > > > > > > +       if ((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR104) ||
> > > > > > > > > +           ((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR50) &&
> > > > > > > > > +           (host->flags & SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING)))
> > > > > > > > > +               ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> > > > > > > > > +       else {
> > > > > > > > > +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock,
> > flags);
> > > > > > > > > +               return;
> > > > > > > > > +       }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       /*
> > > > > > > > > +        * As per the Host Controller spec v3.00,
> tuning
> > > > > command
> > > > > > > > > +        * generates Buffer Read Ready interrupt, so
> > enable
> > > > > that.
> > > > > > > > > +        */
> > > > > > > > > +       sdhci_unmask_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       /*
> > > > > > > > > +        * Issue CMD19 repeatedly till Execute Tuning
> is
> > > set
> > > > to
> > > > > 0
> > > > > > or the
> > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > +        * of loops reaches 40 times or a timeout of
> > 150ms
> > > > > occurs.
> > > > > > > > > +        */
> > > > > > > > > +       timeout = 150;
> > > > > > > > > +       do {
> > > > > > > > > +               struct mmc_command cmd;
> > > > > > > > > +               struct mmc_request mrq;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               if (!tuning_loop_counter && !timeout)
> > > > > > > > > +                       break;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct
> > > mmc_command));
> > > > > > > > > +               cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
> > > > > > > > > +               cmd.arg = 0;
> > > > > > > > > +               cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               memset(&cmd.resp, 0, sizeof(cmd.resp));
> > > > > > > > > +               cmd.retries = 0;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               cmd.data = NULL;
> > > > > > > > > +               cmd.error = 0;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               memset(&mrq, 0, sizeof(struct
> > > mmc_request));
> > > > > > > > > +               mrq.cmd = &cmd;
> > > > > > > > > +               host->mrq = &mrq;
> > > > > > > > > +               sdhci_send_command(host, &cmd);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               host->cmd = NULL;
> > > > > > > > > +               host->mrq = NULL;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock,
> > flags);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               /* Wait for Buffer Read Ready interrupt
> > */
> > > > > > > > > +               wait_event_interruptible_timeout(host-
> > > > > >buf_ready_int,
> > > > > > > > > +                                       (host-
> > >tuning_done
> > > ==
> > > > > 1),
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > msecs_to_jiffies(50));
> > > > > > > > > +               spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               if (!host->tuning_done) {
> > > > > > > > > +                       printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ":
> > > > Tuning
> > > > > > procedure"
> > > > > > > > > +                               " failed, falling back
> to
> > > > fixed
> > > > > sampling"
> > > > > > > > > +                               " clock\n");
> > > > > > > > > +                       ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK;
> > > > > > > > > +                       ctrl &=
> ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> > > > > > > > > +                       sdhci_writew(host, ctrl,
> > > > > SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +                       goto out;
> > > > > > > > > +               }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               host->tuning_done = 0;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               ctrl = sdhci_readw(host,
> > > > SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > > > > > +               tuning_loop_counter--;
> > > > > > > > > +               timeout--;
> > > > > > > > > +               mdelay(1);
> > > > > > > > > +       } while (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +       /*
> > > > > > > > > +        * The Host Driver has exhausted the maximum
> > number
> > > > of
> > > > > > loops
> > > > > > > > > allowed,
> > > > > > > > > +        * so use fixed sampling frequency.
> > > > > > > > > +        */
> > > > > > > > > +       if (!tuning_loop_counter || !timeout) {
> > > > > > > > > +               ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK;
> > > > > > > > > +               sdhci_writew(host, ctrl,
> > > > SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > > > > > +       } else {
> > > > > > > > > +               if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK))
> > > > > > > > > +                       printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ":
> > > > Tuning
> > > > > > procedure"
> > > > > > > > > +                               " failed, falling back
> to
> > > > fixed
> > > > > sampling"
> > > > > > > > > +                               " clock\n");
> > > > > > > > > +       }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +out:
> > > > > > > > > +       sdhci_mask_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL);
> > > > > > > > > +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >  static const struct mmc_host_ops sdhci_ops = {
> > > > > > > > >         .request        = sdhci_request,
> > > > > > > > >         .set_ios        = sdhci_set_ios,
> > > > > > > > > @@ -1492,6 +1609,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops
> > > > > sdhci_ops
> > > > > > =
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > >         .enable_sdio_irq = sdhci_enable_sdio_irq,
> > > > > > > > >         .start_signal_voltage_switch    =
> > > > > > > > > sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch,
> > > > > > > > >         .get_max_current_180            =
> > > > > sdhci_get_max_current_180,
> > > > > > > > > +       .execute_tuning                 =
> > > > sdhci_execute_tuning,
> > > > > > > > >  };
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> /**********************************************************************
> > > > > > > > > *******\
> > > > > > > > > @@ -1703,6 +1821,16 @@ static void
> sdhci_data_irq(struct
> > > > > > sdhci_host
> > > > > > > > > *host, u32 intmask)
> > > > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > > >         BUG_ON(intmask == 0);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +       /* CMD19 generates _only_ Buffer Read Ready
> > > interrupt
> > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > +       if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL) {
> > > > > > > > > +               if (SDHCI_GET_CMD(sdhci_readw(host,
> > > > > SDHCI_COMMAND))
> > > > > > > > > +                               ==
> MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK)
> > {
> > > > > > > > > +                       host->tuning_done = 1;
> > > > > > > > > +                       wake_up(&host->buf_ready_int);
> > > > > > > > > +                       return;
> > > > > > > > > +               }
> > > > > > > > > +       }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >         if (!host->data) {
> > > > > > > > >                 /*
> > > > > > > > >                  * The "data complete" interrupt is
> also
> > > used
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > @@ -2126,6 +2254,10 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct
> > sdhci_host
> > > > > > *host)
> > > > > > > > >         if (caps[1] & SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50)
> > > > > > > > >                 mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +       /* Does the host needs tuning for SDR50? */
> > > > > > > > > +       if (caps[1] & SDHCI_USE_SDR50_TUNING)
> > > > > > > > > +               host->flags |=
> SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >         /* Driver Type(s) (A, C, D) supported by the
> host
> > > */
> > > > > > > > >         if (caps[1] & SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A)
> > > > > > > > >                 mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A;
> > > > > > > > > @@ -2269,6 +2401,9 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct
> > sdhci_host
> > > > > *host)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         setup_timer(&host->timer, sdhci_timeout_timer,
> > > > > (unsigned
> > > > > > > > > long)host);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +       if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300)
> > > > > > > > > +               init_waitqueue_head(&host-
> > >buf_ready_int);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >         ret = request_irq(host->irq, sdhci_irq,
> > > IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > > > > > >                 mmc_hostname(mmc), host);
> > > > > > > > >         if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > > > > > > > index 5bf244d..4746879 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > > > > > > > @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@
> > > > > > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_A         0x0010
> > > > > > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_C         0x0020
> > > > > > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_D         0x0030
> > > > > > > > > +#define  SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING                0x0040
> > > > > > > > > +#define  SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK          0x0080
> > > > > > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE  0x8000
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  #define SDHCI_CAPABILITIES     0x40
> > > > > > > > > @@ -187,6 +189,7 @@
> > > > > > > > >  #define  SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A   0x00000010
> > > > > > > > >  #define  SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C   0x00000020
> > > > > > > > >  #define  SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D   0x00000040
> > > > > > > > > +#define  SDHCI_USE_SDR50_TUNING        0x00002000
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  #define SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1   0x44
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > > > > b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > > > > > > > > index e84cd05..651e40b 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > > > > > > > > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         int     (*start_signal_voltage_switch)(struct
> > > > mmc_host
> > > > > > *host);
> > > > > > > > >         int     (*get_max_current_180)(struct mmc_host
> > > *mmc);
> > > > > > > > > +       void    (*execute_tuning)(struct mmc_host
> *host);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why execute_tuning ops return type is void? Will there
> not
> > be
> > > > any
> > > > > > > error
> > > > > > > > scenarios? What if host fails to find any tuning point?
> > > > Shouldn't
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > return
> > > > > > > > error to the core layer and then core layer should not
> > begin
> > > > with
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > read/write operations?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In case the tuning procedure fails, Host Controller falls
> > back
> > > on
> > > > > > using
> > > > > > > Fixed Sampling clock, so data transfer can still continue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that's not a correct assumption. Let's say tuning
> fails
> > > and
> > > > > > host
> > > > > > controller falls back to fixed sampling clock and card still
> > > > operates
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > SDR104 with CLK=208MHz. This means that all further
> read/write
> > > > > > transactions
> > > > > > will mainly result in CRC Fail errors and none of the
> > > transactions
> > > > > may
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > successful. So we can't just leave the host controller in
> state
> > > > where
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > cannot perform high speed transfers (because it's tuning had
> > > > failed)
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > then start issuing commands with high speed transfer
> conditions
> > > > > > (CLK=208MHz). Better way is for host to inform core layer
> that
> > > > tuning
> > > > > > has
> > > > > > failed and then there should not be any further transactions
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > card
> > > > > > or fallback to low speed modes (SDR12, SDR25 or SDR50) or
> power
> > > > cycle
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > card.
> > > > >
> > > > > The host controller spec v3.00 clearly says that the occurrence
> > of
> > > an
> > > > > error during tuning procedure is indicated by Sampling Select,
> > > which
> > > > > will be set to 0 in case tuning fails. But that won't stop the
> > > > > controller to retry re-tuning procedure based on the re-tuning
> > > mode.
> > > > So
> > > > > I don't see any reason for transaction to be stopped in case
> > tuning
> > > > > fails.
> > > >
> > > > This capability is not there with host controller on our
> chipsets.
> > So
> > > > then
> > > > what to do? I think referring Host controller spec v3.00 should
> not
> > > be
> > > > proper here. As this spec is not a must condition for all host
> > > > controller
> > > > implementations.
> > >
> > > In that case, I would really appreciate if you could implement the
> > > procedure which will work for your controller, and then we can
> merge
> > > the code with mine.
> >
> > Ok that's fine. but that doesn't mean "execute_tuning" ops should not
> > have
> > any return type in your implementation. We should be able to return
> the
> > error from this ops. From your driver you can always return the
> success
> > from
> > "execute_tuning" ops which should solve your purpose. In case
> > "execute_tuning" returns error then "mmc_sd_init_uhs_card" would
> return
> > error which would result in removing the card.
> >
> > So this way it should satisfy all the different implementations of
> > "execute_tuning" ops by different host controller drivers.
> >
> > Please let me know if this is fine with you or not?
> 
> If you want me to return error the very first time tuning fails, and
> the card being removed, I am fine with that. But I am not sure if all
> the host controller would be happy with the implementation. Since some
> controller like ours would still want re-tuning to be tried the next
> time round. Anyways, I will implement your suggestion.

Those who want the retuning be tried again at latter point of time, can
return success from "execute_tuning".

> 
> Thanks,
> Arindam
> 
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Arindam
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Arindam
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Arindam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  };
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  struct mmc_card;
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > > > b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > > > > > > > > index 612301f..9194f9e 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > > > > > > > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> > > > > > > > >  #define MMC_SET_BLOCKLEN         16   /* ac   [31:0]
> > block
> > > > len
> > > > > > > R1
> > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > >  #define MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK    17   /* adtc [31:0]
> > data
> > > > addr
> > > > > > > R1
> > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > >  #define MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK  18   /* adtc [31:0]
> > data
> > > > addr
> > > > > > > R1
> > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > +#define MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK    19   /* adtc
> > > > > > > R1
> > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >    /* class 3 */
> > > > > > > > >  #define MMC_WRITE_DAT_UNTIL_STOP 20   /* adtc [31:0]
> > data
> > > > addr
> > > > > > > R1
> > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > > > > > b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > > > > > > > > index 282d158..5203b97 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > > > > > > > > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> > > > > > > > >  #define SDHCI_USE_ADMA         (1<<1)  /* Host is ADMA
> > > > capable
> > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > >  #define SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA      (1<<2)  /* Use DMA for
> > this
> > > > > > > req. */
> > > > > > > > >  #define SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD      (1<<3)  /* Device
> > > > unresponsive
> > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > +#define SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING (1<<4)        /*
> SDR50
> > > > needs
> > > > > tuning
> > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         unsigned int version;   /* SDHCI spec. version
> */
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -147,6 +148,9 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         struct mmc_command      *saved_abort_cmd; /*
> > Abort
> > > > > command
> > > > > > saved
> > > > > > > > > for data error recovery */
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +       wait_queue_head_t       buf_ready_int;  /*
> > > Waitqueue
> > > > > for Buffer
> > > > > > Read
> > > > > > > > > Ready interrupt */
> > > > > > > > > +       unsigned int            tuning_done;    /*
> > > Condition
> > > > > flag
> > > > > > set
> > > > > > > > > when CMD19 succeeds */
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >         unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned;
> > > > > > > > >  };
> > > > > > > > >  #endif /* __SDHCI_H */
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > 1.7.1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > linux-
> > > > > mmc"
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-
> > > > info.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> mmc"
> > in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux