> -----Original Message----- > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:04 PM > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during > uhs initialization > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nath, Arindam > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:53 AM > > To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during > > uhs initialization > > > > Hi Subhash, > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:50 AM > > > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning > during > > > uhs initialization > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Nath, Arindam [mailto:Arindam.Nath@xxxxxxx] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:45 AM > > > > To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning > > during > > > > uhs initialization > > > > > > > > Hi Subhash, > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:38 AM > > > > > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning > > > during > > > > > uhs initialization > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc- > > > > > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nath, Arindam > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:37 PM > > > > > > To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; > anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning > > > > during > > > > > > uhs initialization > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Subhash, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:29 PM > > > > > > > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > > > > > > mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; > > anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for > tuning > > > > > during > > > > > > > uhs initialization > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Arindam Nath [mailto:anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > > Of > > > > > > Arindam > > > > > > > > Nath > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 5:03 PM > > > > > > > > To: cjb@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx; prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx; > > > > > > > > subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > > > > henry.su@xxxxxxx; > > > > > > > > aaron.lu@xxxxxxx; anath.amd@xxxxxxxxx; Arindam Nath > > > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning > > > > during > > > > > > uhs > > > > > > > > initialization > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Host Controller needs tuning during initialization to > > operate > > > > > SDR50 > > > > > > > > and SDR104 UHS-I cards. Whether SDR50 mode actually needs > > > > tuning > > > > > is > > > > > > > > indicated by bit 45 of the Host Controller Capabilities > > > > register. > > > > > > > > A new command CMD19 has been defined in the Physical > Layer > > > spec > > > > > > > > v3.01 to request the card to send tuning pattern. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We enable Buffer Read Ready interrupt at the very > begining > > of > > > > > > tuning > > > > > > > > procedure, because that is the only interrupt generated > by > > > the > > > > > Host > > > > > > > > Controller during tuning. The tuning block is sent by the > > > card > > > > to > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Host Controller using DAT lines, so we set Data Present > > > Select > > > > > (bit > > > > > > > 5) > > > > > > > > in the Command register. The Host Controller is > responsible > > > for > > > > > > doing > > > > > > > > the verfication of tuning block sent by the card at the > > > > hardware > > > > > > > level. > > > > > > > > After sending CMD19, we wait for Buffer Read Ready > > interrupt. > > > > In > > > > > > case > > > > > > > > we don't receive an interrupt after the specified timeout > > > > value, > > > > > we > > > > > > > > fall back on fixed sampling clock by setting Execute > Tuning > > > > (bit > > > > > 6) > > > > > > > > and Sampling Clock Seletc (bit 7) of Host Control2 > register > > > to > > > > 0. > > > > > > > > Before exiting the tuning procedure, we disable Buffer > Read > > > > Ready > > > > > > > > interrupt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 4 + > > > > > > > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 137 > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > > > > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 3 + > > > > > > > > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + > > > > > > > > include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 1 + > > > > > > > > include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h | 4 + > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c > b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c > > > > > > > > index be01397..1e2d157 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c > > > > > > > > @@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static int > mmc_sd_init_uhs_card(struct > > > > > > mmc_card > > > > > > > > *card) > > > > > > > > /* Set current limit for the card */ > > > > > > > > err = sd_set_current_limit(card, status); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* SPI mode doesn't define CMD19 */ > > > > > > > > + if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && card->host- > > >ops- > > > > > > > > >execute_tuning) > > > > > > > > + card->host->ops->execute_tuning(card- > > >host); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > out: > > > > > > > > kfree(status); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > > > > > > > index 245cc39..8f4f102 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > > > > > > > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_USE_LEDS_CLASS > > > > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#define MAX_TUNING_LOOP 40 > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > static unsigned int debug_quirks = 0; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *, > struct > > > > > > mmc_data > > > > > > > > *); > > > > > > > > @@ -985,7 +987,9 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(struct > > > > > > sdhci_host > > > > > > > > *host, struct mmc_command *cmd) > > > > > > > > flags |= SDHCI_CMD_CRC; > > > > > > > > if (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_OPCODE) > > > > > > > > flags |= SDHCI_CMD_INDEX; > > > > > > > > - if (cmd->data) > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + /* CMD19 is special in that the Data Present > Select > > > > should > > > > > be set > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > + if (cmd->data || (cmd->opcode == > > > > MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK)) > > > > > > > > flags |= SDHCI_CMD_DATA; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_CMD(cmd->opcode, > > > flags), > > > > > > > > SDHCI_COMMAND); > > > > > > > > @@ -1485,6 +1489,119 @@ static int > > > > > sdhci_get_max_current_180(struct > > > > > > > > mmc_host *mmc) > > > > > > > > return max_current_180; > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +static void sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc) > > > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > > > + struct sdhci_host *host; > > > > > > > > + u16 ctrl; > > > > > > > > + int tuning_loop_counter = MAX_TUNING_LOOP; > > > > > > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > > > > > > + unsigned long timeout; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + host = mmc_priv(mmc); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > > > + * Host Controller needs tuning only in case of > > > SDR104 > > > > mode > > > > > > > > + * and for SDR50 mode when Use Tuning for SDR50 > is > > > set > > > > in > > > > > > > > + * Capabilities register. > > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > > + if ((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR104) || > > > > > > > > + ((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR50) && > > > > > > > > + (host->flags & SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING))) > > > > > > > > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING; > > > > > > > > + else { > > > > > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, > flags); > > > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > > > + * As per the Host Controller spec v3.00, tuning > > > > command > > > > > > > > + * generates Buffer Read Ready interrupt, so > enable > > > > that. > > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > > + sdhci_unmask_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > > > + * Issue CMD19 repeatedly till Execute Tuning is > > set > > > to > > > > 0 > > > > > or the > > > > > > > > number > > > > > > > > + * of loops reaches 40 times or a timeout of > 150ms > > > > occurs. > > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > > + timeout = 150; > > > > > > > > + do { > > > > > > > > + struct mmc_command cmd; > > > > > > > > + struct mmc_request mrq; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + if (!tuning_loop_counter && !timeout) > > > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct > > mmc_command)); > > > > > > > > + cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK; > > > > > > > > + cmd.arg = 0; > > > > > > > > + cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + memset(&cmd.resp, 0, sizeof(cmd.resp)); > > > > > > > > + cmd.retries = 0; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + cmd.data = NULL; > > > > > > > > + cmd.error = 0; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + memset(&mrq, 0, sizeof(struct > > mmc_request)); > > > > > > > > + mrq.cmd = &cmd; > > > > > > > > + host->mrq = &mrq; > > > > > > > > + sdhci_send_command(host, &cmd); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + host->cmd = NULL; > > > > > > > > + host->mrq = NULL; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, > flags); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + /* Wait for Buffer Read Ready interrupt > */ > > > > > > > > + wait_event_interruptible_timeout(host- > > > > >buf_ready_int, > > > > > > > > + (host- > >tuning_done > > == > > > > 1), > > > > > > > > + > > > msecs_to_jiffies(50)); > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + if (!host->tuning_done) { > > > > > > > > + printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": > > > Tuning > > > > > procedure" > > > > > > > > + " failed, falling back to > > > fixed > > > > sampling" > > > > > > > > + " clock\n"); > > > > > > > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK; > > > > > > > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING; > > > > > > > > + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, > > > > SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + host->tuning_done = 0; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, > > > SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > > > > > > > > + tuning_loop_counter--; > > > > > > > > + timeout--; > > > > > > > > + mdelay(1); > > > > > > > > + } while (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > > > + * The Host Driver has exhausted the maximum > number > > > of > > > > > loops > > > > > > > > allowed, > > > > > > > > + * so use fixed sampling frequency. > > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > > + if (!tuning_loop_counter || !timeout) { > > > > > > > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK; > > > > > > > > + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, > > > SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > > > > > > > > + } else { > > > > > > > > + if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK)) > > > > > > > > + printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": > > > Tuning > > > > > procedure" > > > > > > > > + " failed, falling back to > > > fixed > > > > sampling" > > > > > > > > + " clock\n"); > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > +out: > > > > > > > > + sdhci_mask_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL); > > > > > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags); > > > > > > > > +} > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > static const struct mmc_host_ops sdhci_ops = { > > > > > > > > .request = sdhci_request, > > > > > > > > .set_ios = sdhci_set_ios, > > > > > > > > @@ -1492,6 +1609,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops > > > > sdhci_ops > > > > > = > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > .enable_sdio_irq = sdhci_enable_sdio_irq, > > > > > > > > .start_signal_voltage_switch = > > > > > > > > sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch, > > > > > > > > .get_max_current_180 = > > > > sdhci_get_max_current_180, > > > > > > > > + .execute_tuning = > > > sdhci_execute_tuning, > > > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /********************************************************************** > > > > > > > > *******\ > > > > > > > > @@ -1703,6 +1821,16 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct > > > > > sdhci_host > > > > > > > > *host, u32 intmask) > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(intmask == 0); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* CMD19 generates _only_ Buffer Read Ready > > interrupt > > > > */ > > > > > > > > + if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL) { > > > > > > > > + if (SDHCI_GET_CMD(sdhci_readw(host, > > > > SDHCI_COMMAND)) > > > > > > > > + == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK) > { > > > > > > > > + host->tuning_done = 1; > > > > > > > > + wake_up(&host->buf_ready_int); > > > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > if (!host->data) { > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > * The "data complete" interrupt is also > > used > > > > to > > > > > > > > @@ -2126,6 +2254,10 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct > sdhci_host > > > > > *host) > > > > > > > > if (caps[1] & SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50) > > > > > > > > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Does the host needs tuning for SDR50? */ > > > > > > > > + if (caps[1] & SDHCI_USE_SDR50_TUNING) > > > > > > > > + host->flags |= SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > /* Driver Type(s) (A, C, D) supported by the host > > */ > > > > > > > > if (caps[1] & SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A) > > > > > > > > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A; > > > > > > > > @@ -2269,6 +2401,9 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct > sdhci_host > > > > *host) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > setup_timer(&host->timer, sdhci_timeout_timer, > > > > (unsigned > > > > > > > > long)host); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300) > > > > > > > > + init_waitqueue_head(&host- > >buf_ready_int); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > ret = request_irq(host->irq, sdhci_irq, > > IRQF_SHARED, > > > > > > > > mmc_hostname(mmc), host); > > > > > > > > if (ret) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h > > > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h > > > > > > > > index 5bf244d..4746879 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h > > > > > > > > @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_A 0x0010 > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_C 0x0020 > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_D 0x0030 > > > > > > > > +#define SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING 0x0040 > > > > > > > > +#define SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK 0x0080 > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE 0x8000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_CAPABILITIES 0x40 > > > > > > > > @@ -187,6 +189,7 @@ > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A 0x00000010 > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C 0x00000020 > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D 0x00000040 > > > > > > > > +#define SDHCI_USE_SDR50_TUNING 0x00002000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1 0x44 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h > > > > b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > > > > > > > > index e84cd05..651e40b 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > > > > > > > > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct mmc_host_ops { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > int (*start_signal_voltage_switch)(struct > > > mmc_host > > > > > *host); > > > > > > > > int (*get_max_current_180)(struct mmc_host > > *mmc); > > > > > > > > + void (*execute_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why execute_tuning ops return type is void? Will there not > be > > > any > > > > > > error > > > > > > > scenarios? What if host fails to find any tuning point? > > > Shouldn't > > > > > it > > > > > > > return > > > > > > > error to the core layer and then core layer should not > begin > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > read/write operations? > > > > > > > > > > > > In case the tuning procedure fails, Host Controller falls > back > > on > > > > > using > > > > > > Fixed Sampling clock, so data transfer can still continue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that's not a correct assumption. Let's say tuning fails > > and > > > > > host > > > > > controller falls back to fixed sampling clock and card still > > > operates > > > > > in > > > > > SDR104 with CLK=208MHz. This means that all further read/write > > > > > transactions > > > > > will mainly result in CRC Fail errors and none of the > > transactions > > > > may > > > > > be > > > > > successful. So we can't just leave the host controller in state > > > where > > > > > it > > > > > cannot perform high speed transfers (because it's tuning had > > > failed) > > > > > and > > > > > then start issuing commands with high speed transfer conditions > > > > > (CLK=208MHz). Better way is for host to inform core layer that > > > tuning > > > > > has > > > > > failed and then there should not be any further transactions > with > > > the > > > > > card > > > > > or fallback to low speed modes (SDR12, SDR25 or SDR50) or power > > > cycle > > > > > the > > > > > card. > > > > > > > > The host controller spec v3.00 clearly says that the occurrence > of > > an > > > > error during tuning procedure is indicated by Sampling Select, > > which > > > > will be set to 0 in case tuning fails. But that won't stop the > > > > controller to retry re-tuning procedure based on the re-tuning > > mode. > > > So > > > > I don't see any reason for transaction to be stopped in case > tuning > > > > fails. > > > > > > This capability is not there with host controller on our chipsets. > So > > > then > > > what to do? I think referring Host controller spec v3.00 should not > > be > > > proper here. As this spec is not a must condition for all host > > > controller > > > implementations. > > > > In that case, I would really appreciate if you could implement the > > procedure which will work for your controller, and then we can merge > > the code with mine. > > Ok that's fine. but that doesn't mean "execute_tuning" ops should not > have > any return type in your implementation. We should be able to return the > error from this ops. From your driver you can always return the success > from > "execute_tuning" ops which should solve your purpose. In case > "execute_tuning" returns error then "mmc_sd_init_uhs_card" would return > error which would result in removing the card. > > So this way it should satisfy all the different implementations of > "execute_tuning" ops by different host controller drivers. > > Please let me know if this is fine with you or not? If you want me to return error the very first time tuning fails, and the card being removed, I am fine with that. But I am not sure if all the host controller would be happy with the implementation. Since some controller like ours would still want re-tuning to be tried the next time round. Anyways, I will implement your suggestion. Thanks, Arindam > > > > > > Thanks, > > Arindam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Arindam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Arindam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct mmc_card; > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h > > > b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h > > > > > > > > index 612301f..9194f9e 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h > > > > > > > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ > > > > > > > > #define MMC_SET_BLOCKLEN 16 /* ac [31:0] > block > > > len > > > > > > R1 > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > #define MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK 17 /* adtc [31:0] > data > > > addr > > > > > > R1 > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > #define MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK 18 /* adtc [31:0] > data > > > addr > > > > > > R1 > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > +#define MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK 19 /* adtc > > > > > > R1 > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* class 3 */ > > > > > > > > #define MMC_WRITE_DAT_UNTIL_STOP 20 /* adtc [31:0] > data > > > addr > > > > > > R1 > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h > > > > > b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h > > > > > > > > index 282d158..5203b97 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h > > > > > > > > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct sdhci_host { > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_USE_ADMA (1<<1) /* Host is ADMA > > > capable > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA (1<<2) /* Use DMA for > this > > > > > > req. */ > > > > > > > > #define SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD (1<<3) /* Device > > > unresponsive > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > +#define SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING (1<<4) /* SDR50 > > > needs > > > > tuning > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned int version; /* SDHCI spec. version */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -147,6 +148,9 @@ struct sdhci_host { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct mmc_command *saved_abort_cmd; /* > Abort > > > > command > > > > > saved > > > > > > > > for data error recovery */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + wait_queue_head_t buf_ready_int; /* > > Waitqueue > > > > for Buffer > > > > > Read > > > > > > > > Ready interrupt */ > > > > > > > > + unsigned int tuning_done; /* > > Condition > > > > flag > > > > > set > > > > > > > > when CMD19 succeeds */ > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned; > > > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > #endif /* __SDHCI_H */ > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > 1.7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > > linux- > > > > mmc" > > > > > in > > > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo- > > > info.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" > in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
