Hi, On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:43:52PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > +1. A full cycle in linux-next might an idea to be on the safe side? That > would be 2.6.40-material then. Or too slow? I think it could be okay to merge for .39, but that's mainly because I don't think we start getting testing with a lot of cards until patches appear in an -rc1 -- so for something that requires broad testing, I'd rather merge it for -rc1 with a plan to revert it if we find anything unexpected. But I don't have a strong opinion, so if anyone thinks there's a reason to wait (for example, an existence-proof of a card that misbehaves when configured with a max timeout value) then I'm happy to do so. Thanks, -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
