Hi Wolfram, On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 04:51:30PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > Thanks for respinning \o/ This approach looks better to me, but CCing > > > Olof to comment on abstraction issues if he has them. Will do a deeper > > > review later this week. > > > > > > I like it! Definitely the right approach. Pushing quirks down into the > > I/O accessors is definitely the only scalable way to handle all the > > various buggy controllers out there. > > > > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> > > Glad to hear that. I do have a few issues though, will report them later > as mentioned before, it needs a bit of time. What issues on what SoC/board did you find? Maybe we can help debug? Thanks Richard > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
