> > Thanks for respinning \o/ This approach looks better to me, but CCing > > Olof to comment on abstraction issues if he has them. Will do a deeper > > review later this week. > > > I like it! Definitely the right approach. Pushing quirks down into the > I/O accessors is definitely the only scalable way to handle all the > various buggy controllers out there. > > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> Glad to hear that. I do have a few issues though, will report them later as mentioned before, it needs a bit of time. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
