On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:16:24PM +0100, Arnd Hannemann wrote: > Am 05.01.2011 19:57, schrieb Chris Ball: > > Arnd, can I take just patches 1/2 from your six-part series, and have > > you send the rest through the arch/ maintainers later? > > Sure, should be no problem. > Ah, just saw that you already pushed those two, thanks. > > @Paul: > Maybe it would be best that you ACK those arch patches (if you think > they are ok) and that they also go in via the mmc-next tree? > Otherwise we would need to wait until mmc-next for .38 is merged in your trees, > right? > If Chris prefers they go through the architecture side then that's not a problem either. I'll be doing at least 2 merges during the merge window, and this stuff is just adding in platform data, so it doesn't really matter when it gets rolled in. Optionally if the MMC tree doesn't rebase I can just set up a topic branch that branches off of that, roll these patches on top of that, and you can just test that directly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
