On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:26:42 +0100 Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:58:38PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > > > Hi Matt, > > > > Just FYI, the newer version of these patches also have a whole bunch > > of acked-by and tested-by tags, see this email: > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/20/429 > > > > Thanks for your help! > > Argh, right. Claws-mail searching has completely failed me. I didn't > even see that thread when searching to "tmio_mmc". Back to mutt.. > > Andrew, can you drop the patch with my changelog and pick up the one in > that thread seeing as it's got all the tags and a new changelog? Thanks. I actually already had it, as tmio_mmc-dont-clear-unhandled-pending-interrupts.patch, scheduled for 2.6.36 and -stable. What's the score with "tmio_mmc: allow 2 byte requests in 4-bit mode"? I didn't merge it because Ian said "This change needs to be modified to test what hardware is present. this wont work on my hardware TTBOMK.". Then I later _did_ merge it because it got sneakily renamed to "tmio_mmc: revise a limit of the data size". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
