Re: [PATCH 0/9 v3] add DMA support to tmio_mmc, using dmaengine API, use it on SH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 May 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:44:21 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 May 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:07:07 +0200 (CEST)
> > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > 2.6.35 release is approaching and Ian hasn't found time yet to review this 
> > > > > series, so I was wondering, maybe you could take it into mm at least for 
> > > > > now?
> > > > 
> > > > Well I did, but I don't know how useful that was.
> > > > 
> > > > WHo is the most appropriate tree-maintainer to review and possibly
> > > > merge these?
> > > 
> > > Samuel has already acked the MFD patch:
> > > 
> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/7985
> > > 
> > > (please, add this his ack to the patch too). Most of the patches in the 
> > > series are SuperH- or SH-Mobile specific, which makes Paul (added to CC) 
> > > the perfect candidate to review them. There is only one tmio-specific 
> > > patch, and it is also the most complicated one. You or Paul can certainly 
> > > just follow it to verify, that it doesn't introduce any regressions. I can 
> > > also confirm it, because I also tested the patched driver without DMA 
> > > loaded, and it worked just like before in PIO mode. It would, however, be 
> > > great to test the patches on a non-sdhi hardware, of which none of us, 
> > > probably, has any. I added Philipp Zabel to CC, who has contributed a few 
> > > patches to tmio_mmc in the past, perhaps, he still has access to the 
> > > hardware and could test these patches.
> > > 
> > I don't have any problems taking all of the SH and SDHI related bits, but
> > since they all depend on the tmio_mmc change I haven't picked them up
> > yet. They'll likely continue to sit in my patch queue until something
> > happens with the tmio_mmc changes. Given the response times we've had
> > with any tmio related changes in the past I'm not exactly betting on a
> > speedy resolution..
> 
> argh.  Patches have names, guys.  What are "the tmio_mmc changes" and
> where are they?

This one is meant:

mmc-add-dma-support-to-tmio_mmc-driver-when-used-on-superh.patch

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux