On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2010, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:07:07 +0200 (CEST) > > Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > 2.6.35 release is approaching and Ian hasn't found time yet to review this > > > series, so I was wondering, maybe you could take it into mm at least for > > > now? > > > > Well I did, but I don't know how useful that was. > > > > WHo is the most appropriate tree-maintainer to review and possibly > > merge these? > > Samuel has already acked the MFD patch: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/7985 > > (please, add this his ack to the patch too). Most of the patches in the > series are SuperH- or SH-Mobile specific, which makes Paul (added to CC) > the perfect candidate to review them. There is only one tmio-specific > patch, and it is also the most complicated one. You or Paul can certainly > just follow it to verify, that it doesn't introduce any regressions. I can > also confirm it, because I also tested the patched driver without DMA > loaded, and it worked just like before in PIO mode. It would, however, be > great to test the patches on a non-sdhi hardware, of which none of us, > probably, has any. I added Philipp Zabel to CC, who has contributed a few > patches to tmio_mmc in the past, perhaps, he still has access to the > hardware and could test these patches. > I don't have any problems taking all of the SH and SDHI related bits, but since they all depend on the tmio_mmc change I haven't picked them up yet. They'll likely continue to sit in my patch queue until something happens with the tmio_mmc changes. Given the response times we've had with any tmio related changes in the past I'm not exactly betting on a speedy resolution.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
