On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -456,11 +458,20 @@ static struct resource sdhi0_cn7_resources[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static struct sh_mobile_sdhi_info sh7724_sdhi0_data = {
> + .dma_slave_tx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_TX,
> + .dma_slave_rx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_RX,
> + .tmio_flags = TMIO_IMMEDIATE_RX_COMPLETE,
> +};
> +
> static struct platform_device sdhi0_cn7_device = {
> .name = "sh_mobile_sdhi",
> .id = 0,
> .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(sdhi0_cn7_resources),
> .resource = sdhi0_cn7_resources,
> + .dev = {
> + .platform_data = &sh7724_sdhi0_data,
> + },
> .archdata = {
> .hwblk_id = HWBLK_SDHI0,
> },
> @@ -479,11 +490,19 @@ static struct resource sdhi1_cn8_resources[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static struct sh_mobile_sdhi_info sh7724_sdhi1_data = {
> + .dma_slave_tx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI1_TX,
> + .dma_slave_rx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI1_RX,
And these two are the opposite of Ecovec even though both are sh7724? Hm..
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
