On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -442,6 +444,8 @@ static void sdhi0_set_pwr(struct platform_device *pdev, int state)
> }
>
> static struct sh_mobile_sdhi_info sdhi0_info = {
> + .dma_slave_tx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_TX,
> + .dma_slave_rx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_RX,
> .set_pwr = sdhi0_set_pwr,
> };
>
> @@ -478,6 +482,9 @@ static void sdhi1_set_pwr(struct platform_device *pdev, int state)
> }
>
> static struct sh_mobile_sdhi_info sdhi1_info = {
> + .dma_slave_tx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI1_TX,
> + .dma_slave_rx = SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI1_RX,
> + .tmio_flags = TMIO_DEFER_RX_COMPLETE,
This is a bit odd. How come SDHI1 needs this flag and SDHI0 doesn't?
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
