On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 20:58 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:08:57AM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote: > > As for checkpatch, I noticed that commit 9c0ece069b3 removed "feature > > -removal.txt" file, and checkpatch removed this check in commit > > 78e3f1f01d2. checkpatch does not have such check since then. So, I am > > inclined not to add this check back to checkpatch. > > I didn't mean that. > > Rather, something along the lines of, for example, > the DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE matching but match those > resource matching functions using the strings, i.e., > "(walk_iomem_res|find_next_iomem_res|region_intersects)" or so and > warn when new code uses them and that it should rather use the new > desc-matching variants. OK, I will add a check to walk_iomem_res(). I will remove @name from region_intersects(), and find_next_iomem_res() is an internal function. Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>