On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:48:20PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Seems reasonable to me as well and yes, there will be extra fill-in > work to do. I have some of the archs already converted, will wait until this initial patchset is in to submit. > The "lvl" thing stands out - kernel code doesn't do this arbitrary > vowelicide to make identifiers shorter. s/lvl/level/g? There are show_regs_log_lvl(), show_trace_log_lvl(), show_stack_log_lvl() (avr32, x86) and I just wanted to keep the naming consistent. If you're strong about this I can change it and resubmit. -- Aristeu -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>