Re: [PATCH 0/5] dump_stack: allow specifying printk log level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:21:25 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > This patchset introduces two new functions:
> > 	dump_stack_lvl(char *log_lvl)
> > 	show_stack_lvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp, char *log_lvl)
> > 
> > and both can be reimplemented by each architecture but only the second is
> > expected. The idea is to initially implement show_stack_lvl() in all
> > architectures then simply have show_stack() to require log_lvl as parameter.
> > While that happens, dump_stack() uses can be changed to dump_stack_lvl() and
> > once everything is in place, dump_stack() will require the log_level as well.
> 
> This looks good to me FWIW.

Seems reasonable to me as well and yes, there will be extra fill-in
work to do.

The "lvl" thing stands out - kernel code doesn't do this arbitrary
vowelicide to make identifiers shorter.  s/lvl/level/g?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]