On Fri 27-11-15 17:40:41, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 11/26/2015 04:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 12-11-15 10:53:01, Jan Kara wrote: > >>On Wed 11-11-15 15:13:53, mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> > >>>Hi, > >>>this has been posted previously as a part of larger GFP_NOFS related > >>>patch set (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438768284-30927-1-git-send-email-mhocko%40kernel.org) > >>>but I think it makes sense to discuss it even out of that scope. > >>> > >>>I would like to hear FS and other MM people about the proposed interface. > >>>Using mapping_gfp_mask blindly doesn't sound good to me and vm_fault > >>>looks like a proper channel to communicate between MM and FS layers. > >>> > >>>Comments? Are there any better ideas? > >> > >>Makes sense to me and the filesystems I know should be fine with this > >>(famous last words ;). Feel free to add: > >> > >>Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> > > > >Thanks a lot! Are there any objections from other fs/mm people? > > Please replace "GFP_IOFS" in the subject, as the "flag" has been removed > recently. Otherwise Done. mm: Allow GFP_{FS,IO} for page_cache_read page cache allocation > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> Thanks -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>