On 11/26/2015 04:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 12-11-15 10:53:01, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 11-11-15 15:13:53, mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,
this has been posted previously as a part of larger GFP_NOFS related
patch set (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438768284-30927-1-git-send-email-mhocko%40kernel.org)
but I think it makes sense to discuss it even out of that scope.
I would like to hear FS and other MM people about the proposed interface.
Using mapping_gfp_mask blindly doesn't sound good to me and vm_fault
looks like a proper channel to communicate between MM and FS layers.
Comments? Are there any better ideas?
Makes sense to me and the filesystems I know should be fine with this
(famous last words ;). Feel free to add:
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks a lot! Are there any objections from other fs/mm people?
Please replace "GFP_IOFS" in the subject, as the "flag" has been removed
recently. Otherwise
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>