On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> It's currently inconvenient to retrieve MM_ANONPAGES value from status
> and statm files and there is no way to separate MM_FILEPAGES and
> MM_SHMEMPAGES. Add RssAnon, RssFile and RssShm lines in /proc/<pid>/status
> to solve these issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Mostly
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
but I loathe the alignment...
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 10 +++++++++-
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> index 82d3657..c887a42 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ For example, to get the status information of a process, all you have to do is
> VmLck: 0 kB
> VmHWM: 476 kB
> VmRSS: 476 kB
> + RssAnon 352 kB
> + RssFile: 120 kB
> + RssShm: 4 kB
That looks nice...
> VmData: 156 kB
> VmStk: 88 kB
> VmExe: 68 kB
> @@ -231,7 +234,12 @@ Table 1-2: Contents of the status files (as of 4.1)
> VmSize total program size
> VmLck locked memory size
> VmHWM peak resident set size ("high water mark")
> - VmRSS size of memory portions
> + VmRSS size of memory portions. It contains the three
> + following parts (VmRSS = RssAnon + RssFile + RssShm)
> + RssAnon size of resident anonymous memory
> + RssFile size of resident file mappings
> + RssShm size of resident shmem memory (includes SysV shm,
> + mapping of tmpfs and shared anonymous mappings)
> VmData size of data, stack, and text segments
> VmStk size of data, stack, and text segments
> VmExe size of text segment
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 9b9708e..7332afd 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -23,9 +23,13 @@
>
> void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> - unsigned long data, text, lib, swap, ptes, pmds;
> + unsigned long data, text, lib, swap, ptes, pmds, anon, file, shmem;
> unsigned long hiwater_vm, total_vm, hiwater_rss, total_rss;
>
> + anon = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> + file = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_FILEPAGES);
> + shmem = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SHMEMPAGES);
> +
> /*
> * Note: to minimize their overhead, mm maintains hiwater_vm and
> * hiwater_rss only when about to *lower* total_vm or rss. Any
> @@ -36,7 +40,7 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> hiwater_vm = total_vm = mm->total_vm;
> if (hiwater_vm < mm->hiwater_vm)
> hiwater_vm = mm->hiwater_vm;
> - hiwater_rss = total_rss = get_mm_rss(mm);
> + hiwater_rss = total_rss = anon + file + shmem;
> if (hiwater_rss < mm->hiwater_rss)
> hiwater_rss = mm->hiwater_rss;
>
> @@ -53,6 +57,9 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> "VmPin:\t%8lu kB\n"
> "VmHWM:\t%8lu kB\n"
> "VmRSS:\t%8lu kB\n"
> + "RssAnon:\t%8lu kB\n"
> + "RssFile:\t%8lu kB\n"
> + "RssShm:\t%8lu kB\n"
... but on my terminal that comes out as
VmPeak: 4584 kB
VmSize: 4584 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmPin: 0 kB
VmHWM: 1264 kB
VmRSS: 1264 kB
RssAnon: 84 kB
RssFile: 1180 kB
RssShm: 0 kB
VmData: 184 kB
VmStk: 136 kB
VmExe: 48 kB
VmLib: 1808 kB
VmPTE: 32 kB
VmPMD: 12 kB
VmSwap: 0 kB
HugetlbPages: 0 kB
Notice anything ugly about that? Of course, what's really wrong was
the years-ago choice of absurdly short names, with a tab after them.
Ugh. The HugetlbPages line probably can't be helped (even HugeTLB:
would be too long). But your three, I hope we can do better: I can
understand why Rss instead of Vm, sure, Vm on the front contributes
nothing but incorrectness, and it wasn't a bad idea to group them as
contributors to VmRSS.
I suggest either indenting them with spaces to keep the alignment,
" Anon:\t%8lu kB\n"
" File:\t%8lu kB\n"
" Shmem:\t%8lu kB\n"
or keeping your Rss prefix but misaligning the three together,
"RssAnon:\t%8lu kB\n"
"RssFile:\t%8lu kB\n"
"RssShmem:\t%8lu kB\n"
I somewhat prefer "Shmem" to "Shm" because "Shmem" is what
/proc/meminfo already says, and "Shm" makes me think of SysV SHM only.
But I'd happily settle for Shm if it helped in the alignment.
I realize that /proc/<pid>/status is not universally loved for its
aesthetic charm, and I may be the only one who feels this way...
Hugh
> "VmData:\t%8lu kB\n"
> "VmStk:\t%8lu kB\n"
> "VmExe:\t%8lu kB\n"
> @@ -66,6 +73,9 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> mm->pinned_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> hiwater_rss << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> total_rss << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> + anon << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> + file << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> + shmem << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> data << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> mm->stack_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10), text, lib,
> ptes >> 10,
> --
> 2.5.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>