On 09/29, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > struct task_struct *next_task_with_mm(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *t;
> >
> > p = p->group_leader;
> > while ((p = next_task(p)) != &init_task) {
> > if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
> > continue;
> >
> > t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
> > if (t)
> > return t;
> > }
> >
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > #define for_each_task_lock_mm(p)
> > for (p = &init_task; (p = next_task_with_mm(p)); task_unlock(p))
> >
> >
> > So that you can do
> >
> > for_each_task_lock_mm(p) {
> > do_something_with(p->mm);
> >
> > if (some_condition()) {
> > // UNFORTUNATELY you can't just do "break"
> > task_unlock(p);
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > do you think it makes sense?
>
> Sure, I'm inclined to use the above code from you.
>
> > In fact it can't be simpler, we can move task_unlock() into next_task_with_mm(),
> > it can check ->mm != NULL or p != init_task.
>
> s/can't/can ?
yes, sorry,
> But even with that I'm not sure I can parse your suggestion. Got some (pseudo) code
> perhaps?
I meant
struct task_struct *next_task_lock_mm(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct task_struct *t;
if (p) {
task_unlock(p);
p = p->group_leader;
} else {
p = &init_task;
}
while ((p = next_task(p)) != &init_task) {
if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
continue;
t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
if (t)
return t;
}
return NULL;
}
#define for_each_task_lock_mm(p)
for (p = NULL; (p = next_task_lock_mm(p)); )
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>