On 08-15-15, Andrew Morton wrote: > Yes, I agree that if memblock's debugfs_create_file() fails, we want to > know about it because something needs fixing. But that's true of > all(?) debugfs_create_file callsites, so it's a bit silly to add > warnings to them all. Why not put the warning into > debugfs_create_file() itself? Good idea, but there are already some debugfs_create_file calls with checks and warning, if these checks failed. I don't know how many, but I saw it. Double warning is not good too. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>