On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Almost description is copied from commit fb05e7a89f50 > ("net: don't wait for order-3 page allocation"). > > I saw excessive direct memory reclaim/compaction triggered by slub. > This causes performance issues and add latency. Slub uses high-order > allocation to reduce internal fragmentation and management overhead. But, > direct memory reclaim/compaction has high overhead and the benefit of > high-order allocation can't compensate the overhead of both work. > > This patch makes auxiliary high-order allocation atomic. If there is > no memory pressure and memory isn't fragmented, the alloction will still > success, so we don't sacrifice high-order allocation's benefit here. > If the atomic allocation fails, direct memory reclaim/compaction will not > be triggered, allocation fallback to low-order immediately, hence > the direct memory reclaim/compaction overhead is avoided. In the > allocation failure case, kswapd is waken up and trying to make high-order > freepages, so allocation could success next time. > > Following is the test to measure effect of this patch. > > System: QEMU, CPU 8, 512 MB > Mem: 25% memory is allocated at random position to make fragmentation. > Memory-hogger occupies 150 MB memory. > Workload: hackbench -g 20 -l 1000 > > Average result by 10 runs (Base va Patched) > > elapsed_time(s): 4.3468 vs 2.9838 > compact_stall: 461.7 vs 73.6 > pgmigrate_success: 28315.9 vs 7256.1 > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>