Re: [PATCHv9 28/36] mm, numa: skip PTE-mapped THP on numa fault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/20/2015 04:21 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We're going to have THP mapped with PTEs. It will confuse numabalancing.
> Let's skip them for now.

Fair enough.

Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 074edab89b52..52f6fa02c099 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3186,6 +3186,12 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* TODO: handle PTE-mapped THP */
> +	if (PageCompound(page)) {
> +		pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Avoid grouping on RO pages in general. RO pages shouldn't hurt as
>  	 * much anyway since they can be in shared cache state. This misses
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]