[PATCHv9 28/36] mm, numa: skip PTE-mapped THP on numa fault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We're going to have THP mapped with PTEs. It will confuse numabalancing.
Let's skip them for now.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memory.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 074edab89b52..52f6fa02c099 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3186,6 +3186,12 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	/* TODO: handle PTE-mapped THP */
+	if (PageCompound(page)) {
+		pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Avoid grouping on RO pages in general. RO pages shouldn't hurt as
 	 * much anyway since they can be in shared cache state. This misses
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]