On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (06/30/15 15:46), David Rientjes wrote: > > > > There are essential elements to an oom context that are passed around to > > > > multiple functions. > > > > > > > > Organize these elements into a new struct, struct oom_context, that > > > > specifies the context for an oom condition. > > > > > > > > > > s/oom_context/oom_control/ ? > > > > > > > I think it would be confused with the existing memory.oom_control for > > memcg. > > > > Hello David, > > Sorry, I meant that in commit message you say > > :Organize these elements into a new struct, struct oom_context, that > :specifies the context for an oom condition. > > but define and use `struct oom_control' (not `struct oom_context') > Oh, point very well taken, thank you. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>