On Mon 29-06-15 11:46:53, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This changes us returning the value of one to -ENOMEM when the call
> for allocating memory with the function kzalloc_node fails in order
> to better comply with kernel coding pratices of returning this
> particular error code when memory allocations that are unrecoverable
> occur.
I do not see any point in such a patch. Let me repeat, and hopefully for
the last time, the patch has to make _sense_ and the changelog should
provide a _justification_ for the change. None of this is true for this
patch.
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
I am not interested in changes like this in the code I maintain.
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index acb93c5..4e80811 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4442,7 +4442,7 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
> tmp = -1;
> pn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
> if (!pn)
> - return 1;
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
> mz = &pn->zoneinfo[zone];
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>