Re: [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Add some <foo>_destroy functions to NEEDLESS_IF tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:

> On (06/11/15 11:41), Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > Sergey Senozhatsky has modified several destroy functions that can
> > > now be called with NULL values.
> > >
> > >  - kmem_cache_destroy()
> > >  - mempool_destroy()
> > >  - dma_pool_destroy()
> >
> > I don't actually see any null test in the definition of dma_pool_destroy,
> > in the linux-next 54896f27dd5 (20150610).  So I guess it would be
> > premature to send patches to remove the null tests.
> >
>
> yes,
>
> Andrew Morton:
> : I'll park these patches until after 4.1 is released - it's getting to
> : that time...

OK, thanks,

julia

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]