Re: [PATCH 12/49] writeback: move backing_dev_info->bdi_stat[] into bdi_writeback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:02:31PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Maybe bdi_wb_destroy() would be somewhat more descriptive than
> bdi_wb_exit()? Otherwise the patch looks good to me. You can add:
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Hmmm... maybe, I don't know.  I feel weird matching up destroy with
init instead of create.  Why is exit weird?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]