Am 24.03.2015 um 16:24 schrieb Hajime Tazaki: > I was thinking that such 'architectural' differences in core > idea (like system call handling, execution model, process > context design, etc) is better to have a different architecture > even if some part of the code is similar. > > Isn't it also the same to the other 'hardware-dependent' > architectures' case like between arm and arm64 ? > > of course I'm also happy to share the code between us, > especially _pure_ userspace part like (virtual) NIC with > tap or pcap because we also need that part, but we kept such > code at an external codebase (i.e., linux-libos-tools). I'd say you should try hard to re-use/integrate your work in arch/um. With um we already have an architecture which targets userspace, having two needs a very good justification. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>