Am 24.03.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Hajime Tazaki: > == More information == > > The crucial difference between UML (user-mode linux) and this approach > is that we allow multiple network stack instances to co-exist within a > single process with dlmopen(3) like linking for easy debugging. Is this the only difference? We already have arch/um, why do you need arch/lib/ then? My point is, can't you merge your arch/lib into the existing arch/um stuff? >From a very rough look your arch/lib seems like a micro UML. BTW: There was already an idea for having UML as regular library. See: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/projects.html "UML as a normal userspace library" Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>