Re: [PATCH] mm: rcu-protected get_mm_exe_file()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 19:18 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On 16.03.2015 17:50, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 15:07 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> 	3. and we can remove down_write(mmap_sem) from prctl paths.
> >>
> >> 	   Actually we can do this even without xchg() above, but we might
> >> 	   want to kill MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED and test_and_set_bit() check.
> >
> > Yeah I was waiting for security folks input about this, otherwise this
> > still doesn't do it for me as we still have to deal with mmap_sem.
> >
> 
> Why? mm->flags are updated atomically. mmap_sem isn't required here.

Right, nm I was thinking of the set but Oleg's xchg() idea is obviously
correct and a much better approach to mine. The only thing I'd suggest
is explicitly commenting the lockless get_mm_exe_file callers, if
useful, you can take it from my patch 1.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]