Re: [PATCH] mm: rcu-protected get_mm_exe_file()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/16, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
> On 16.03.2015 17:07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> I mean, I think we can do another cleanup on top of this change.
>>
>> 	1. set_mm_exe_file() should be called by exit/exec only, so
>> 	   it should use
>>
>> 		rcu_dereference_protected(mm->exe_file,
>> 					atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1);
>>
>> 	2. prctl() should not use it, it can do
>>
>> 	   get_file(new_exe);
>> 	   old_exe = xchg(&mm->exe_file);
>> 	   if (old_exe)
>> 	   	fput(old_exe);
>
> I think smp_mb() is required before xchg() or
> probably this stuff should be hidden inside yet another magic RCU macro
> ( with two screens of comments =)

Not really, xchg() implies mb's on both sides. As any other atomic operation
which returns the result.

(And in fact we do not even need rcu_assign_pointer() in set_mm_exe_file(),
 get_mm_exe_file() could do READ_ONCE() + inc_not_zero(). But this is off-
 topic, and of course rcu_* helpers look better)

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]