Re: [PATCH] x86, kaslr: propagate base load address calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> Alternatively, we can forbid zero-sized randomization, and always enforce 
> at least some minimal offset to be chosen in case zero would be chosen.

Okay, I see, that might not be always possible, depending on the memory 
map layout.

So I'll just send you a respin of my previous patch tomorrow that would, 
instead of defining __KERNEL_OFFSET as a particular value, introduce a 
simple global flag which would indicate whether kaslr is in place or not.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]