On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:49:47AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>
> > @@ -2400,11 +2400,16 @@ int __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> > return (ret ? 1 : 0);
> > }
> >
> > +void __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> > +{
> > + __cache_shrink(cachep);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why do we need this wrapper? Rename __cache_shrink to __kmem_cache_shrink
> instead?
>
__cache_shrink() is used not only in __kmem_cache_shrink(), but also in
SLAB's __kmem_cache_shutdown(), where we do need its return value to
check if the cache is empty.
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>