On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Last submit didn't go into -mm/3.19-rc, no prob but here I retry > (possibly too early for 3.20-rc but I don't expect breakages in this > area post -rc4) after a rebase on upstream. The series looks good to me, I didn't spot any material changes from last time. I would fold patches 3 & 4 together: it's the same idea behind both, just different parts of the tree. You could argue also for folding 1 &2 together, the "damage" is done in 1, 2 as a standalone results in an (IMHO) unnecessarily large diff. Thanks, Andres ------ 8< snipping the rest --------------- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>