Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> If such a delay is theoretically impossible, I'm OK with your patch.
>
Oops, I forgot to mention that task_unlock(p) should be called before
put_task_struct(p), in case p->usage == 1 at put_task_struct(p).
* If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
* its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
*/
- if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
+ task_lock(p);
+ if (p->mm && task_will_free_mem(p)) {
set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
put_task_struct(p);
+ task_unlock(p);
return;
}
+ task_unlock(p);
if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
dump_header(p, gfp_mask, order, memcg, nodemask);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>