On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:30:20AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Avoid using the page struct address on free by just doing an
> address comparison. That is easily doable now that the page address
> is available in the page struct and we already have the page struct
> address of the object to be freed calculated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Index: linux/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c 2014-12-09 12:25:45.770405462 -0600
> +++ linux/mm/slub.c 2014-12-09 12:25:45.766405582 -0600
> @@ -2625,6 +2625,13 @@ slab_empty:
> discard_slab(s, page);
> }
>
> +static bool same_slab_page(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, void *p)
> +{
> + long d = p - page->address;
> +
> + return d > 0 && d < (1 << MAX_ORDER) && d < (compound_order(page) << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +}
> +
Somtimes, compound_order() induces one more cacheline access, because
compound_order() access second struct page in order to get order. Is there
any way to remove this?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>