On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> I was expecting to see at least (specifically) 4.291 ns improvement, as
> this is the measured[1] cost of preempt_{disable,enable] on my system.
Right. Those calls are taken out of the fastpaths by this patchset for
the CONFIG_PREEMPT case. So the numbers that you got do not make much
sense to me.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>