Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce new VM_NOZEROPAGE flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/18/2014 06:28 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Currently it is an all or nothing thing, but for a future change we might want to just
> tag the guest memory instead of the complete user address space.

I think it's a bad idea to reserve a flag for potential future use.  If
you_need_  it in the future, let's have the discussion then.  For now, I
think it should probably just be stored in the mm somewhere.

I agree with Dave (I thought I disagreed, but I changed my mind while writing down my thoughts). Just define mm_forbids_zeropage in arch/s390/include/asm, and make it return mm->context.use_skey---with a comment explaining how this is only for processes that use KVM, and then only for guests that use storage keys.

Paolo (who was just taught what storage keys really are)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]