On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:04:21 -0700 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there ever a time where the VMAs under an mm have mixed VM_NOZEROPAGE > status? Reading the patches, it _looks_ like it might be an all or > nothing thing. Currently it is an all or nothing thing, but for a future change we might want to just tag the guest memory instead of the complete user address space. > Full disclosure: I've got an x86-specific feature I want to steal a flag > for. Maybe we should just define another VM_ARCH bit. > So you think of something like: #if defined(CONFIG_S390) # define VM_NOZEROPAGE VM_ARCH_1 #endif #ifndef VM_NOZEROPAGE # define VM_NOZEROPAGE VM_NONE #endif right? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>