Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >> The gcc-4.9 case is interesting, are you saying that a gcc-4.9 compiled
> >> kernel works fine on other systems?
> > 
> > Yes, all USII based systems work fine with Debian gcc-4.9, as does 
> > T2000. Of USIII* systems, V210 and V440 exhibit the boot hang with 
> > gcc-4.9 and V480 crashes wit FATAL exception during boot that is 
> > probably earlier than the gcc boot hang so I do not know about V480 and 
> > gcc-4.9. V240 not tested because of fan failures, V245 is in the queue 
> > for setup but not tested so far.
> 
> Ok, on the V210/V440 can you boot with "-p" on the kernel boot command
> line and post the log?  Let's start by seeing how far it gets, maybe
> we can figure out roughly where it dies.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg12238.html and 
http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg12468.html are my relevant 
posts about it. Should I get something more? It would be easy because of 
ALOM.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@xxxxxxxx)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]