Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I'd like to know that your another problem is related to commit
> > bf0dea23a9c0 ("mm/slab: use percpu allocator for cpu cache").  So,
> > if the commit is reverted, your another problem is also gone
> > completely?
> 
> The other problem has been present forever.

Umm? I am afraid I have been describing it badly. This random 
SIGBUS+SIGSEGV problem is new - I have not seen it before.

I have been able to do kernel compiles for years on sparc64 (modulo 
specific bugs in specific configurations) and 3.17 + start/end swap 
patch seems also stable for most machine. With yesterdays git + align 
patch, it dies with SIGBUS multiple times during compilation so it's a 
new regression for me.

Will try reverting that commit tomorrow.

My only other current sparc64 problems that I am seeing - V210/V440 die 
during bootup if compiled with gcc 4.9 and V480 dies with FATAL 
exceptions during bootups since previous kernel release. Maybe also 
exit_mmap warning - I do not know if they have been fixed, I see them 
rarely.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@xxxxxxxx)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]