On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:43:20PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 25-07-14 11:26:54, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 24-07-14 10:46:44, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Wed 23-07-14 17:02:41, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > We can reduce the lookup only to lruvec==true case, no?
> > >
> > > Dohh
> > > s@can@should@
> > >
> > > newpage shouldn't charged in all other cases and it would be bug.
> > > Or am I missing something?
> >
> > Yeah, but I'd hate to put that assumption onto the @lrucare parameter,
> > it just coincides.
>
> Yes, you are right. Maybe replace_page_cache_page should have it's own
> memcg variant which does all the trickery and then call
> mem_cgroup_migrate when necessary...
The code flow doesn't really lend itself to nesting. It's basically
three steps: validate input, clear the old page, commit the new page.
void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage)
{
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(oldpage), oldpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(newpage), newpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(oldpage), oldpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(newpage), newpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageAnon(oldpage) != PageAnon(newpage), newpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTransHuge(oldpage) != PageTransHuge(newpage),
newpage);
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return;
/* Re-entrant migration: old page already uncharged? */
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(oldpage);
if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
return;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!(pc->flags & PCG_MEM), oldpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(do_swap_account && !(pc->flags & PCG_MEMSW), oldpage);
pc->flags = 0;
commit_charge(newpage, pc->mem_cgroup, false);
}
void mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage)
{
struct page_cgroup *pc;
int isolated;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(oldpage), oldpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(newpage), newpage);
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return;
/* New page already charged? */
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(newpage);
if (PageCgroupUsed(pc))
return;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(oldpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!(pc->flags & PCG_MEM), oldpage);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(do_swap_account && !(pc->flags & PCG_MEMSW), oldpage);
lock_page_lru(oldpage, &isolated);
pc->flags = 0;
unlock_page_lru(oldpage, isolated);
commit_charge(newpage, pc->mem_cgroup, true);
}
Only the call to commit_charge() is the same and there is a little bit
of overlap in the VM_BUG_ON_PAGEs... I'd rather have a single migrate
function, because it's so small that the code is simpler than nesting
and/or duplicating multiple functions.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>