On Tuesday 20 May 2014 01:02 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2014 15:52:07 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Shouldn't FAULT_AROUND_ORDER and fault_around_order be changed to be >>>>> the order of the fault-around size in bytes, and fault_around_pages() >>>>> use 1UL << (fault_around_order - PAGE_SHIFT) >>>> >>>> Yes. And shame on me for missing it (this time!) at review. >>>> >>>> There's still time to fix this. Patches, please. >>> >>> Here it is. Made at 3.30 AM, build tested only. >> >> Prefer on top of Maddy's patch which makes it always a variable, rather >> than CONFIG_DEBUG_FS. It's got enough hair as it is. >> > > We're at 3.15-rc5 and this interface should be finalised for 3.16. So > Kirrill's patch is pretty urgent and should come first. > > Well. It's only a debugfs interface at this stage so we are allowed to > change it later, but it's better not to. > My patchset does not change the interface, but uses the current fault around order variable from CONFIG_DEBUG_FS block to allow changes at runtime, instead of having a constant and some cleanup. Thanks for review Regards --Maddy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>